<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Techdoer Times</title>
	<link>http://techdoertimes.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:20:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>Quality</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<li>Two views on quality, one in the eyes of the customer, the other in the eyes of the creator
<li>Deming and Drucker maintained a customer centric view of quality
<li>Pirsig defined quality "not a thing but an event" between creator and creation
<li>Seth Godin suggests to achieve "customer delight" you need to succeed in both views of quality]]></description>
		<link>http://techdoertimes.com/boosting-effectiveness/quality</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Agile #scale</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<li>Success and popularity of Agile practices have earned attention of larger organizations.
<li>Structural and cultural challenges make scaling Agile difficult.
These challenges include: 
<li>"System of reporting" differs from "System of production"
<li>Financial cycles differ from management cycles which differ from project cycles
<li>Management's need for the definition of done
<li>Rewarding individual performance]]></description>
		<link>http://techdoertimes.com/agile/agile-scale</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;Slip the Jab&#8221;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<li>You are the CEO of your professional life. This requires you be an effective leader.  
<li>Effectiveness is wisdom, and wisdom requires prediction.
<li>Effectiveness brings motivation.
<li>Individuals are motivated when they feel a greater sense of control in their ability to produce desired effects.  Aligning work with strengths offers one such way.
<li>Nature really is smarter than people think, and the growing pervasiveness of Evolutionary theory and Complexity Science in management and engineering circles reflects this. 
<li>Sustaining and leveraging improvements to knowledge worker processes requires improving the dependent aspects as suggested in Lean's "See the whole" principle.  
<li>Continuous feedback channels are necessary in order to help individuals and teams adjust when they are veering off course.]]></description>
		<link>http://techdoertimes.com/boosting-effectiveness/slip-the-jab</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>How vs. Why</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<li>There's a tendency to refer to Knowledge as "doing things right", which happens to fit Drucker's classic definition of "efficiency".
<li>There's also a tendency to see Wisdom as "doing the right things", which also neatly fits Drucker's definition of "effectiveness".
<li>This results in a relationship between [Knowledge, Management, Efficiency]  vs. [Wisdom, Leadership, Effectiveness]. The former defined work in the 20th century, the latter will define work in the 21st century.]]></description>
		<link>http://techdoertimes.com/boosting-effectiveness/how-vs-why</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Best (mal)Practices?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<li>"...shared context is vital to knowledge exchange, and such context always involves some human trusted validation. " 
<li>To be effective in complex domains, practices need to be adaptive and promote continuous feedback.]]></description>
		<link>http://techdoertimes.com/boosting-effectiveness/best-malpractices</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

