How vs. Why

Author: Sergio Bogazzi | April 12, 2011 | In: Effectiveness

Read this article in: 0 minutes, 46 seconds

Here is an interesting parallel between the Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom pyramid and the knowledge worker roles and responsibilities defined by Peter Drucker.  Depending on what you read, there exists a tendency to refer to Knowledge as “doing things right”, which happens to fit Drucker’s classic definition of “efficiency”.  On the same token, there’s also a tendency to see Wisdom as “doing the right things”, which also neatly fits Drucker’s definition of “effectiveness”.


Data/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom
Figure 1: DIKW Pyramid

So from Drucker we know that management represents efficiency, leadership represents effectiveness, executives need to be leaders, and all knowledge workers need to think and act like executives.

This leaves us with a curious relationship between [Knowledge, Management, Efficiency]  vs. [Wisdom, Leadership, Effectiveness]. Description is at the heart of the former, which defined work in the 20th century.  Prediction, on the other hand, is at the heart of the latter, and it will define work in this 21st century.




4 Responses to How vs. Why

Avatar

In Search of Knowledge

June 16th, 2011 at 9:56 pm

Avatar

Dave

July 22nd, 2011 at 5:08 pm

I love the integration on the curious relationship between [Knowledge, Management, Efficiency] vs. [Wisdom, Leadership, Effectiveness]. Ingenius! Do you teach on leadership seminars?

Avatar

Kaylea

August 12th, 2011 at 7:09 am

Please keep thorniwg these posts up they help tons.

Avatar

Sheena Gordon

October 15th, 2011 at 5:21 am

This is very interesting and I totally agree with your points! DIKW Pyramid seems pretty accurate in any angle. I will share this to my colleagues. Thanks!

Comment Form

*

Quick Tip

  • There’s a tendency to refer to Knowledge as “doing things right”, which happens to fit Drucker’s classic definition of “efficiency”.
  • There’s also a tendency to see Wisdom as “doing the right things”, which also neatly fits Drucker’s definition of “effectiveness”.
  • This results in a relationship between [Knowledge, Management, Efficiency] vs. [Wisdom, Leadership, Effectiveness]. The former defined work in the 20th century, the latter will define work in the 21st century.